Trump Delays China Tariffs for 90 Days: Impact on Global Trade.
You May Love To Read It:- How AI Is Reshaping the Search Business And What It Means for Investors.
Introduction
In recent years, the United States and China have been engaged in a trade war, where both countries imposed tariffs (taxes on imported goods) on each other’s products. This trade war was initiated largely due to the U.S.’s concerns about China’s trade practices, including intellectual property theft, forced technology transfers, and a large trade imbalance.
In this context, former U.S. President Donald Trump had introduced tariffs on hundreds of billions of dollars’ worth of Chinese goods. However, at one point, he decided to extend the deadline for increasing tariffs by 90 days as a sign of goodwill and progress in ongoing trade negotiations with China.
What Happened
In 2018, President Trump imposed tariffs on Chinese goods worth hundreds of billions of dollars. The tariffs were meant to pressure China into making changes to trade policies that the U.S. considered unfair. China responded with its own tariffs on U.S. goods, especially agricultural products.
Tariff Increase Plan
Trump had initially planned to increase tariffs from 10% to 25% on approximately $200 billion worth of Chinese imports starting March 1, 2025. These tariffs affected a wide range of products, from electronics to consumer goods.
90-Day Extension
In late February 2019, President Trump announced he would delay the tariff hike by 90 days. This extension was granted because U.S. and Chinese officials were making progress in trade talks. Trump tweeted that the negotiations had led to “substantial progress” on key issues such as:
Intellectual property protection
Technology transfer
Agriculture
Services
Currency stability
Purpose of the Extension
The 90-day delay was intended to give negotiators more time to finalize a comprehensive trade agreement. It was seen as a gesture of goodwill and a sign that both sides wanted to avoid escalating the trade war further. Trump also hinted that if a deal was reached, he would meet with Chinese President Xi Jinping to officially conclude the agreement.
Impact of the Decision
Stock markets around the world responded positively to the delay, as it reduced the risk of further trade escalation. Many American businesses, especially retailers and manufacturers who relied on Chinese imports, welcomed the delay. However, critics warned that this was just a temporary pause and that deeper issues still remained unresolved.
Advantages 90-Days Tariff Deadline Extension
Gave More Time for Trade Negotiations
The extension allowed U.S. and Chinese trade negotiators more time to work out a comprehensive agreement without the pressure of an immediate tariff increase. This helped avoid rushed decisions and allowed both sides to focus on resolving complex issues like:
Intellectual property theft
Forced technology transfer
Currency manipulation
Agricultural market access
Trade deals of this scale are highly complex. More time meant a better chance of reaching a well-structured and fair agreement.
Reduced Global Market Uncertainty
Financial markets and global investors reacted positively to the news. The 90-day delay reduced fears of an all-out trade war escalating. Uncertainty in trade policy often causes stock markets to fall and business confidence to drop. A delay gave markets more stability and confidence that a peaceful resolution was possible.
Relief for American Businesses and Consumers
The planned tariff increase from 10% to 25% would have made many Chinese imports more expensive in the U.S.
Delaying this increase gave American businesses and retailers time to:
Reorganize their supply chains
Import goods before the hike
Avoid immediate cost increases
Without the delay, prices on goods like electronics, furniture, clothing, and auto parts could have risen, hurting consumers and businesses alike.
Improved Diplomatic Relations (Short-Term)
The extension was seen as a goodwill gesture by the U.S., which encouraged China to stay at the negotiation table. It reduced political tensions between the two largest economies in the world. Positive diplomatic signals help build trust, which is essential for long-term trade relationships and global cooperation.
Supported U.S. Farmers and Exporters
China had imposed retaliatory tariffs on U.S. agricultural products like soybeans, pork, and corn. The 90-day delay improved the chances of China buying more U.S. farm goods as part of ongoing negotiations.
American farmers, many of whom were suffering due to lost exports, saw the delay as a chance for recovery and renewed sales to China.
Protected Jobs in the Short Term
By preventing an immediate hike in tariffs, businesses were less likely to cut jobs or reduce investment due to cost increases. If tariffs had risen suddenly, some companies may have laid off workers or delayed hiring, especially those dependent on Chinese imports.
Encouraged Stability in Global Supply Chains
A sudden tariff increase could have disrupted international supply chains. The delay helped stabilize operations for multinational companies. Global companies often source parts and materials from multiple countries, including China. Sudden changes create chaos and higher costs.
Pros
More Time for Negotiations: Allowed both countries to continue trade talks without immediate pressure. Increased the chance of a more comprehensive and balanced trade deal.
Reduced Market Uncertainty: Global stock markets and investors responded positively. Helped stabilize financial markets that were rattled by the threat of a tariff hike.
Relief for American Businesses and Consumers: Delayed cost increases on goods imported from China. Protected consumers from rising prices on everyday products (electronics, clothing, appliances).
Support for U.S. Farmers and Exporters: Gave hope to American farmers affected by China’s retaliatory tariffs. Increased possibility of China buying more U.S. agricultural products during talks.
Improved Diplomatic Tone: Acted as a goodwill gesture, lowering political tensions. Encouraged China to stay engaged in negotiations.
Protected U.S. Jobs (Short-Term): Delayed potential layoffs or downsizing that businesses may have faced due to higher import costs.
Cons
Delayed Economic Pressure on China: Critics argued that delaying the tariff increase reduced U.S. leverage in negotiations. Some believed that China could use the extra time to stall or avoid making key concessions.
Extended Uncertainty for Businesses: While the delay offered temporary relief, it didn’t end the trade war. Many businesses were still unsure about long-term costs and investment plans.
Perceived Weakness: Opponents claimed Trump’s decision to delay the tariffs showed a lack of resolve. It may have made the U.S. appear willing to compromise too easily.
No Guarantee of a Deal: The extension didn’t guarantee that a final agreement would be reached. In fact, the talks could (and later did) break down again.
Political Criticism: Both Democrats and Republicans criticized the delay some felt it wasn’t tough enough, while others believed it prolonged trade tensions unnecessarily.